It sure is a puff piece. I was going to reject it out of hand. In fact I was in the middle of slating it when I actually looked up how hammerhead sharks see. I

It sure is a puff piece. I was going to reject it out of hand. In fact I was in the middle of slating it when I actually looked up how hammerhead sharks see. I learnt that hammerhead sharks have really good binocular vision. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8376000/8376740.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8376000/837...) I am wary of the depth map they've provided. It looks suspiciously smooth and stable. Given that roads have little to no features of use, the belief propagation must be very good (or its been tarted up in post.) I assume they use feature matching to estimate the camera movement, and the those same features are compared from each camera to get the divergence. I would be interested to see the calibration setup, and how it performs at speed.