> I prefer Fedora-based and Arch-based flavors for that reason. It's usually pretty easy to find stuff. > Backtrack used to do something like this and while it

> I prefer Fedora-based and Arch-based flavors for that reason. It's usually pretty easy to find stuff. > Backtrack used to do something like this and while it was easier compared to a lot of other debian/ubuntu based things, I still ran into some pain points. FTA you linked: > Most Linux distributions follow the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard and declare it their own policy to maintain FHS compliance. GoboLinux and NixOS provide examples of intentionally non-compliant filesystem implementations. Debian and Ubuntu adhere to FHS; they're not more difficult in this regard than Arch or Fedora (or distributions based on these). GoboLinux and NixOS don't because they serve a higher goal. GoboLinux for user-friendliness/explorability and has backwards compatibility (which is hidden via optional kernel extension), NixOS aims to solve dependency hell (among various other goals). Learning curves are an obvious drawback. > ls -la `which <program>` Backticks should be avoided; use ls -la $(which <program>) instead (avoid the $ in Fish).