3 ms·
How thoroughly are 'opinion' articles vetted? Not at all? Why are they considered substantial then. > Dr. Kory asked the National Institutes of Health to revie
by adamredwoods 6y ago
How thoroughly are 'opinion' articles vetted? Not at all? Why are they considered substantial then.
> Dr. Kory asked the National Institutes of Health to review his group’s manuscript outlining dozens of successful trials and to consider updating its Aug. 27 guidance in which it recommended “against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of Covid-19, except in a clinical trial.” On Dec. 10, Sen. Rand Paul and I sent a letter to the NIH requesting that it review Dr. Kory’s evidence.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7521351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7521351/
- gltchkrft 6y agohttps://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/ https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-the... Last Updated: August 27, 2020 The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in a clinical trial (AIII).
- m-p-3 6y agohttps://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/statement-on-ivermectin/ https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/statement-on-... Last Updated: January 14, 2021 > The COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) has determined that currently there are insufficient data to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. And I agree, we need more data before moving forward.
- gltchkrft 6y agoYes. That was after the senate testimony session, that youtube removed. At the time of that senate testimony, this was the recommendation.