6 ms·
EteSync – Secure Data Sync
- miguelrochefort 6y agoHow does it compare to Nextcloud?
- vinay427 6y agoIt's for contacts, calendar, tasks, and notes. It's more of a CalDAV/CardDAV replacement with end-to-end encryption than a Nextcloud replacement, which AFAIK doesn't have E2EE for syncing these bits. Also, as it doesn't directly use CalDAV/CardDAV it depends on a client app. At least on Android, the app syncs to the system calendar/contacts so it works just as seamlessly as Nextcloud's recommendation of DAVx5 or any other contacts/calendar/tasks service in that you can access the data from any standard calendar or contacts application.
- StavrosK 6y ago> which AFAIK doesn't have E2EE for syncing these bits Which ends do you mean? It supports TLS, so it's E2EE (between server and client).
- minitech 6y agoThe relevant “ends” in end-to-end encryption are usually clients, and that’s the case here.
- Triv888 6y agoSo it is basically the same... except that you can't share pictures, videos, or other file types? I wonder why you need a DAVx5-like app with EteSync if that is all it does?
- tasn 6y agoIt's not basically the same. Encryption makes the whole difference. With NextCloud all of your data is accessible by your provider, its employees, hackers, and everyone who gains access to the server. This is not theoretical, hacks happen all the time.
- Triv888 6y agoThe provider is me... so if I get hacked, they could get the data while it is unencrypted on the client side.
- tasn 6y agoNot everyone is a techie and can self host. You'd also need to self-host at home (even more of a pain). And anyhow, even if you are hosting at home, an internet connected server is much more of a target than a usually-behind-NAT phone.
- Triv888 6y agoIt is not externally accessible... only the home VPN is (I'm also using DDNS just in case my semi-static IPv4 changes). But of course nothing is 100% secure.
- tasn 6y agoSure, if you have a VPN that's probably fine. Though this is another piece of tech you need to setup, and thus another barrier for non techies. That's why encryption (secure by default) is better than having users know how to securely setup things, and even needing to know that it's a concern.
- acct776 6y agoNextCloud uses the protocol/you can sync your NextCloud account with it.
- tasn 6y agoNextCloud doesn't support the EteSync protocol, so you can't sync your EteSync account with it. NextCloud is not encrypted.
- mtmsr 6y agoDiscussion from 3m ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24895830 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24895830
- dang 6y agoAlso 2017: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13975965 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13975965 (The one from 3 months ago didn't get significant attention so I don't think we'll mark it a dupe - see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html.)
- alexandrerond 6y agoEtesync is awesome. Totally worth the buck. Does one (or two things) and does them well. Support is superb. Perfect for backing up and syncing contacts for those that don't want to give the data to Google etc.
- tasn 6y agoThanks. :)
- jamesponddotco 6y agoI use EteSync both at my company and personal life to share events with the team or with my wife, and to manage my contacts and tasks on my "no Google allowed" phone. I can integrate with calcurse[1] to stay up to date during the day or with aerc[2] when I need to send an email to someone, because they include a Dav bridge[3], but I can also integrate it with the GNOME environment because a module for evolution exists[4]. Plus, the developer[5] has been genuinely nice and handled all support, and billing questions like a champ, in a speedy manner, and always in a polite tone. My only problem with EteSync so far is that sharing an event can only be done through the web application right now, so I need to switch from calcurse to a browser, share the event, and then come back. Minor issue in the grand scheme of things, though. Well worth the price, in my opinion. Might be one of the few services that I do not migrate to a self-hosted instance instead. [1] https://www.calcurse.org/ https://www.calcurse.org/ [2] https://aerc-mail.org/ https://aerc-mail.org/ [3] https://github.com/etesync/etesync-dav/blob/master/README.md#installation https://github.com/etesync/etesync-dav/blob/master/README.md... [4] https://www.etesync.com/user-guide/evolution/ https://www.etesync.com/user-guide/evolution/ [5] https://github.com/tasn https://github.com/tasn
- mssundaram 6y agoThank you for sharing the resources and inspiration. What email and calendar apps do you use on your phone?
- jamesponddotco 6y agoI use FairEmail[1] as my email client and Simple Calendar Pro[2] for my calendar needs, both from the F-Droid store. [1] https://f-droid.org/en/packages/eu.faircode.email/ https://f-droid.org/en/packages/eu.faircode.email/ [2] https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.simplemobiletools.calendar.pro/ https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.simplemobiletools.calend...
- mssundaram 6y agoThanks!
- vzaliva 6y agoI wish it support ProtonMail address book.
- tasn 6y agoWe wish it did too (developer of EteSync here). The problem is not on our end though, the problem is that ProtonMail uses their own proprietary (and closed) protocols and don't interact with the rest of the apps.
- upofadown 6y agoIt looks like it is mostly end to the same end encryption. So they could of saved some words and just said it was encrypted. Waiting for the marketing people to start calling disk encryption E2EE...
- tasn 6y agoDeveloper of EteSync here. You can share your collections with other users, so it's definitely end-to-end encryption. Though I'd argue that even if it was just single-player, it was still e2ee, because you have multiple devices and the server is oblivious to the contents of the data. Sure, you could maybe call that client-side encryption to have a different term, but that would just confuse people.
- upofadown 6y agoThere is a convention to the use of the E2EE term. All encryption involves a party that encrypts and one that decrypts. When the German U-boat operator used an Enigma machine to decode a message off the radio no one then or now would call what had happened E2EE. That is even in the face of the fact that many operators in many U-boats were decoding the same message. EteSync works in the same way. E2EE is a term normally only used when some distinction from a default case is important. It is in a sense a weaker term than just "encryption". It is normally only used for particular cases in messaging. Something like: "All data is strongly encrypted at all times when off the users devices." strikes me as stronger, better and easier to understand in this case.
- 2Gkashmiri 6y agohow does this fair against syncthing? i use that and "it works"
- tasn 6y agoDeveloper of EteSync here (and a mostly happy user of Syncthing)! EteSync focuses on syncing your contacts, calendars, tasks and notes, not just files (yet). Syncthing doesn't do any of that. There are also big advantages in having a server when it comes to efficiency, performance, and battery life (every Syncthing user knows it's a battery hog on Android). There are many advantages in having a server, and end-to-end encryption means you don't have to pay with your privacy or security to get them.
- flipbrad 6y agoSyncthing has used 0.5% of my phone's battery over the last 7 days, despite a big photo and video sync job, while instantly syncing every change I make to my KeePass database. I can't speak for other Android users, but "every Syncthing user knows it's a battery hog on Android" definitely doesn't reflect my own experience.
- tasn 6y agoThis has been the number one Syncthing complaint since the beginning. Here are just some of the top search results: https://www.reddit.com/r/Syncthing/comments/g5fe9l/there_are_2_different_syncthing_android_apps/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Syncthing/comments/g5fe9l/there_are... https://www.reddit.com/r/Syncthing/comments/8ra7s7/how_to_avoid_huge_battery_drain_from_syncthing/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Syncthing/comments/8ra7s7/how_to_av... https://forum.syncthing.net/t/android-app-consumes-too-much-battery-when-idle/9954 https://forum.syncthing.net/t/android-app-consumes-too-much-... The solution most people resort to is to just disable syncing when not connected to power (which is what I do). Maybe you are lucky, I don't know, but I've always had terrible battery life with Syncthing, and it's a common complaint.
- tasn 6y agoHey everyone, developer of EteSync here. Sorry for not answering questions earlier, I literally just woke up. :P If you are a developer, you may be interested in our related project, Etebase[0], which is an open-source SDK for building end-to-end encrypted applications. Here's the related HN discussion[1]. For those of you that are interested to learn more about EteSync, I was on FLOSS weekly last week[2], and I'll be giving a talk about Etebase at FOSDEM this weekend[3]. [0] https://www.etebase.com https://www.etebase.com [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25059133 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25059133 [2] https://www.twit.community/t/floss-613-etesync-and-etebase/9128 https://www.twit.community/t/floss-613-etesync-and-etebase/9... [3] https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/etebase/ https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/etebase/
- fulafel 6y agoIs there a more detailed "How does it work?" available? For example, how end-to-end is the calendar functionality, does the server side see your calendar entries?
- tasn 6y agoIt uses the Etebase[0] SDK behind the scenes, so you can look at how Etebase works for how EteSync works. Here are the docs: https://docs.etebase.com/protocol-specs/introduction https://docs.etebase.com/protocol-specs/introduction The gist of it is: everything is encrypted. We can't see your calendar entries. [0] https://www.etebase.com https://www.etebase.com
- grmmph 6y agoAwesome!
- johbjo 6y agoHow does it do differential updates if everything is encrypted? It would mean the server needs to keep an eternal log of operations, and each client must replay the log to perform a full sync. This works with lightweight data like contacts and calendars.
- tasn 6y agoEteSync 1.0 (released 4+ years ago), was very much inspired by Git, and it indeed suffered from this problem. Each client had to replay the full log, and it only really worked well for lightweight data. With version 2.0 of the protocol (released end of 2020), we changed it so that items (blobs of data) can be marked as changed and thus you only need to fetch the currently active items, rather than the full operations log. This works much better.