4 ms·
>There should be some low level implementation that pops up a box asking the user if they wish to allow that app to do that I'm not sure what you mean. This is
by cycloptic 6y ago
>There should be some low level implementation that pops up a box asking the user if they wish to allow that app to do that
I'm not sure what you mean. This is actually exactly what is being done in GNOME and KDE's wayland implementations.
- wing-_-nuts 6y agoThere should be some base implementation of wayland (wlroots?), and this sort of thing should happen there. I just disagree with the whole concept that a desktop environment, window manager, or whatever else has to change because the underlying display server changes. That should be fully transparent. It seems to me that these guys have handed way too much off to the desktop / window manager, washed their hands of it and said 'deal with it'.
- cycloptic 6y agoIn wlroots they probably won't implement it because that requires a GUI toolkit and they don't want to depend on any particular toolkit. The push behind wayland happened specifically because the desktop environments wanted to implement their own display server, and it was becoming problematic to try to make it happen transparently. It's actually somewhat of the reverse of what you're saying, desktop environments can only wash their hands of things and push them off to the X server for so long before it becomes untenable.