3 ms·
The problem with faking it, is that it becomes hard to distinguish between the fakers and the makers. And if most everyone is a faker, then even makers can be
by ChuckFrank 15y ago
The problem with faking it, is that it becomes hard to distinguish between the fakers and the makers. And if most everyone is a faker, then even makers can be seen like a faker too. After spending enough time in Los Angeles and New York, possible our national fake-it capitals, I can't tell you how frustrating it is to spend time, money and effort trying to figure out who has real juice. Especially when fakers are faking it so hard that they are standing tall next to the real makers. So instead of encouraging people to fake-it. Just make it. Something made is undeniable, something faked can be outed at any moment. If what you want to make is too big to make, then make it smaller, and if that's still too big, then make it smaller again. Instead of building on your fakes, build on your makes. Having interviewed literally hundreds of candidates for jobs, I have gladly hired a small time maker 100 times over a big time faker.
- nostrademons 15y agoFor most of the examples cited, it doesn't really matter whether someone is faking it or making it. The whole idea is to connect up people with ideas of what can exist (entrepreneurs) together with people with ideas of what should exist (customers). There's no money changing hands; all you're giving is an e-mail address. If the product ends up not existing in the end, you're out the 5 seconds it took to type it in. If the product does end up existing, both you and the entrepreneur end up winning big.
- alanh 15y agoThe article doesn't say to fake being successful. It is talking about faking the product (or feature). There is some clever stuff there, and I’m not sure your criticism is relevant.