4 ms·

Well, it's no surprise that a product with a battery is less resilient than a product without one. But those products don't compete with each other. Also, chea

• ruph123 6y ago
  > Well, it's no surprise that a product with a battery is less resilient than a product without one. But those products don't compete with each other. But they _are_. By now I have seen many review videos that compare them with the typical audiophile/sound production headphones. E.g. Marques compared them with the Sennheiser HD800S [1]. > Also, cheaply available, standardized batteries don't address your e-waste concern either. So your post doesn't seem much different than someone being indignant or even sanctimonious about the wireless preference of others. Does it not? If I can reuse the housing, the drivers, earpads, headband and just need to replace the battery when its dead, does this not reduce e-waste? Also I do not condemn wireless headphones in general, I said it is a shame that products which could be used for many decades in the past become e-waste rather quickly in today's world. And that I would prefer the approach Shure is taking to reduce waste and only replace the highly degrading components (at least with their monitors). [1]: https://youtu.be/UdfSrJvqY_E?t=609 https://youtu.be/UdfSrJvqY_E?t=609