> But that's not contract liberty. You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. "A company is not forced to use wage labor" does not mean "they can choose to empl

> But that's not contract liberty. You're misunderstanding what I'm saying. "A company is not forced to use wage labor" does not mean "they can choose to employ workers under any kind of contract without push-back". Competition goes both ways, not just top down. If you choose to compete with your workers on company resources (AKA wage labor) then you deal with the consequence that these workers use their leverage just as much as you use yours if they have to.