> t all of these running programs have full read-write access to all files on your $HOME? They don't necesarilly do; if you are running flatpak, chances are th

> t all of these running programs have full read-write access to all files on your $HOME? They don't necesarilly do; if you are running flatpak, chances are that they don't. For example, there is a flatpak for MS Teams. For application like this, you want it to be able to share your screen, but it doesn't have any access to your $HOME (in this specific case, only to ~/Downloads). More importantly, if you want to tight up your desktop, why do you criticize something that starts attacking it from one angle, that it is not 100% solution? It is not; others are working on the other angles, and then together it will be the 100% solution. In this case, Wayland is only one piece of puzzle, not the entire puzzle.