>>"How would one develop an experiment that would result in evidence we live in a multiverse? [..]" I don't understand this criticism. It's my understanding, t

>>"How would one develop an experiment that would result in evidence we live in a multiverse? [..]" I don't understand this criticism. It's my understanding, the double slit experiment shows interference between universes. What is the alternative? decoherence?, but how do you develop an experiment that result in evidence that decoherence is real? From a experimental point of view, multiverse have the same evidence that the alternative. From an epistemological point of view, multiverse is a more simple theory. Ergo, until we have more data, we have to prefer the multiverse theory.