> would be pseudoscience if it were to be seen as or communicated as fact. It’s not. Pseudoscience is something labelling itself as science while not adhering

> would be pseudoscience if it were to be seen as or communicated as fact. It’s not. Pseudoscience is something labelling itself as science while not adhering to scientific standards. Claiming it's a fact would be a dead giveaway though. Relativity has been experimentally tested and made accurate predictions, it is impossible for it to be "fully verified."