Quite poorly reasoned, the author errs by not understanding the difference between thinking and reasoning. Reason has a long philosophical tradition but simplif

Quite poorly reasoned, the author errs by not understanding the difference between thinking and reasoning. Reason has a long philosophical tradition but simplified for this context reasoning is thinking with reasons, so if something is easier to reason about it is providing your with more explicit reasons for why things are happening, regardless of the paradigm and style. Is that necessarily better? No, but in most contexts it is. Can it be used deceptively, yes, everything can.