4 ms·

You know there's a difference between a computer and a computer program, right?

by ascorbic 6y ago

konjin 6y ago
The funny thing is that your low effort zinger is factually wrong. Something you'd learn in second year compsci: >In computer science, a universal Turing machine (UTM) is a Turing machine that simulates an arbitrary Turing machine on arbitrary input. The universal machine essentially achieves this by reading both the description of the machine to be simulated as well as the input to that machine from its own tape. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Turing_machine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Turing_machine
- kitd 6y ago
  Your "low effort" response proves that a computer program can be the same as a computer. Not what OP said.
- hnlmorg 6y ago
  > Babbage was the first programmer seeing as he invented the first computer. Einstein invented the theory that later went on to predict black holes yet Einstein himself didn't believe they were possible. It's entirely possible to invent something and yet still underestimate the practical applications of it. Heck, the hacker culture and even a great many musical genres are based on people saying "this thing is cool, but what if we do this with it instead?" > In short: if you are the type of person to think she had anything important to add to computer science you are the type of person to think Steve Jobs was anything but a snake oil salesman with a decent understanding of typography. Lovelace and Jobs couldn't be more different. One was a socially revered individual who made millions selling other peoples work. And the other was mathematical genius who had a significant amount to contribute but society forced to work in the shadows because of her gender. I'm not saying Lovelace didn't have her flaws. But dismissing her achievements as being Baggages is, ironically, akin to your complaint about Jobs.

4 ms·

You know there's a difference between a computer and a computer program, right?

by ascorbic 6y ago

You know there's a difference between a computer and a computer program, right?

konjin 6y ago
The funny thing is that your low effort zinger is factually wrong. Something you'd learn in second year compsci: >In computer science, a universal Turing machine (UTM) is a Turing machine that simulates an arbitrary Turing machine on arbitrary input. The universal machine essentially achieves this by reading both the description of the machine to be simulated as well as the input to that machine from its own tape. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Turing_machine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Turing_machine
- kitd 6y ago
  Your "low effort" response proves that a computer program can be the same as a computer. Not what OP said.
- hnlmorg 6y ago
  > Babbage was the first programmer seeing as he invented the first computer. Einstein invented the theory that later went on to predict black holes yet Einstein himself didn't believe they were possible. It's entirely possible to invent something and yet still underestimate the practical applications of it. Heck, the hacker culture and even a great many musical genres are based on people saying "this thing is cool, but what if we do this with it instead?" > In short: if you are the type of person to think she had anything important to add to computer science you are the type of person to think Steve Jobs was anything but a snake oil salesman with a decent understanding of typography. Lovelace and Jobs couldn't be more different. One was a socially revered individual who made millions selling other peoples work. And the other was mathematical genius who had a significant amount to contribute but society forced to work in the shadows because of her gender. I'm not saying Lovelace didn't have her flaws. But dismissing her achievements as being Baggages is, ironically, akin to your complaint about Jobs.