5 ms·
You should include the previous line on that second quote >there is no plausible mechanism for systemic discrimination by the alleged wrongdoers. Lower-level m
by waiseristy 6y ago
You should include the previous line on that second quote
>there is no plausible mechanism for systemic discrimination by the alleged wrongdoers. Lower-level managers...
If the suit is about systematic bias, this seems to be a pretty good line of reasoning. Complete chaos in compensation outcomes == no bias, or at least if there is, it's probably not coming from the top down
- username90 6y agoRight, you can protect yourself against charges by just delegating all discrimination to low level managers. You don't have to tell them to discriminate, they do that all on their own! But seriously, if you can't pin that kind of discrimination on upper managers you will never be able to root it out.
- User23 6y agoThere are plenty of Silicon Valley companies where South Asian upper management near exclusively hires South Asian engineers
- dietr1ch 6y agoI think it's a language thing, were they are indeed more productive if they use their native languages at work. It's a tough situation because there's already regulation against enforcing a language in the workplace.
- alisonkisk 6y agoWhat? My company conducts business in English by policy.
- trhway 6y ago>if you can't pin <> on upper managers you will never be able to root it out. that how mafia works :) An that is how Uber broke local governments medalion control.
- waiseristy 6y agoOh totally, this is a perfect example of the dissolution of responsibility that corporations are known for. It's obviously more difficult to attack the 5,000 headed low-level hydra, so that's where the "controversial" decisions get made. Genius!
- alisonkisk 6y agoNo. "Systemic" means a problem throughout the system, regardless of design. For example, systemic infection. "Systematic" means creating a plan or system to do it. "Disparate impact" is a legal theory for proving systemic discrimination.