> They should have a measure by which to mark this bet's conclusion. Arguments can be made for both sides. They're not in the science game. They're in the sell

> They should have a measure by which to mark this bet's conclusion. Arguments can be made for both sides. They're not in the science game. They're in the selling content game. In that, all three (let's not forget the person writing the article) appear to have succeeded, gaining exposure (and payment for the article writer) thanks to the bet, regardless of rigor. One could perhaps forsee more books and articles forthcoming as a result of this bet?