3 ms·
I think what lucian1900 may be thinking is that instead of create table purchase_order ( id int primary key, ordered_on timestamptz not nul
by fauigerzigerk 6y ago
I think what lucian1900 may be thinking is that instead of
create table purchase_order (
id int primary key,
ordered_on timestamptz not null,
customer_id int not null references customer,
canceled_on timestamptz
);
you could have
create table purchase_order (
id int primary key,
ordered_on timestamptz not null,
customer_id int not null references customer
);
create table order_cancelation (
order_id int primary key references purchase_order,
canceled_on timestamptz not null
);
This is indeed a better normalised schema and it allows you to index order_cancelation.canceled_on without worrying about nulls.
- lucian1900 6y agoExactly, that’s what I thought was being described.
- crazygringo 6y agoOh then, absolutely. I was assuming a constraint that columns couldn't be removed from the original table. But if you can, then your example is an even better solution.