> Gemini is one technological piece in attempts to make a version of the Internet which is healthier for humans – the so-called “small Internet” movement – and

> Gemini is one technological piece in attempts to make a version of the Internet which is healthier for humans – the so-called “small Internet” movement – and maybe there will be new ideas about how the small Internet should be which would benefit from a new version of the Gemini specification. So it seems risky to lock-in to one version. If there are better ideas or fundamentals on which to build the root of another space, then what the Gemini is protocol is saying is that -- make your own protocol and name it something different. I don't think it's risky to lock-in to the Gemini protocol because: It's very minimal, so A) clients should be minimal as well, and B) Gemini documents are human readable without a client. So if Gemini doesn't work out, your *.gmi files will hardly be useless blobs of tags.