Here's a direct link: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b6df958f8370af3217d4178/t/6011e68dec2c7013d3caf3cb/1611785871154/NYU+False+Accusation+report_FINAL

Here's a direct link: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b6df958f8370af3217d4178/t/6011e68dec2c7013d3caf3cb/1611785871154/NYU+False+Accusation+report_FINAL.pdf https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b6df958f8370af3217d4... Not particularly insightful from what I can glean, and essentially boils down to "Twitter isn't particularly transparent about banning therefore we can't say much about it". That's fine, agnosticism about it is a defensible position. I'm a little skeptical when an academic report is presented in a magazine-style layout with "fancy" graphics and a dearth of substantive data though. That kind of thing is typical of think tanks and "policy recommendations", which are designed for maximal persuasion instead of maximal analysis.