>it seems more likely than not that at least one person there was influenced by Parler. I think that the real, concrete harm done to Parler's by their instant

>it seems more likely than not that at least one person there was influenced by Parler. I think that the real, concrete harm done to Parler's by their instant removal from Amazon is definitely not balanced by whatever "harm" in some Parler client's head before 6 Jan. I don't think it's a close call, and it is scary that federal judges are willing to make such a judgement. The standard here seems to be that any unsubstantiated theoretical harm from user-uploaded content can be used as a basis to instantly kill any AWS client's business, if Amazon suddenly feels like doing so.