4 ms·
Isn't that true of everything? If you were an early adopter of America you could get free land that today could be worth hundreds of millions.
by piracy1 6y ago
Isn't that true of everything? If you were an early adopter of America you could get free land that today could be worth hundreds of millions.
- delaaxe 6y agoThat's a great analogy
- teslaberry 6y agoyea, and thats why land feudalism and revolutions occur. older stakeholders become too top heavy. new ones must take their place by burning lamd records and redistribution of 'gods' bounty (land). bitcoin has inertia but theres zero reason trust cent be established with an entirely new bitcoin 2.0 3.0 4.0......after all that was bcash's pitch. as scammy as it is , at least you roger ver started it not an anonymous japanese dildo. dont like it? start bitcoin 3.0 and airdrop evenly to all citozens, you know ...because ubi solves eveuthing. .
- piracy1 6y agoThanks :)
- lovetocode 6y agoI mean I don’t disagree with you but it still makes my stomach turn a bit.
- MisterSandman 6y agoThat's a valid analogy but also on a much longer time frame. Bitcoin increased in value orders of magnitude quicker than the value of land in the US. If somebody who bought a house 5 years ago was selling it for 100 times today, you bet your ass people would be mad.
- brianobush 6y agoLike Tesla stock? In the past year Tesla has gone parabolic, which looks very much similar to Bitcoin. How are they different?
- piracy1 6y agoDo they have any greater claim to being mad though? It makes you see it more clearly but I do not think it makes it worse. Besides, for most people they just were not alive when it was possible to claim land and nobody left them any. You could have seen crypto you just didn't, in most cases. I think that makes people more mad but once again I do not think it makes it more unjust, just the opposite.