3 ms·
This actual test from 2006 disagrees with you: http://www.ales.litomisky.com/data/projects/Analog%20versus%20Digital%20Shootout%20%28Hasselblad,%2035mm,%20Cano
by sjwright 15y ago
This actual test from 2006 disagrees with you:
http://www.ales.litomisky.com/data/projects/Analog%20versus%20Digital%20Shootout%20%28Hasselblad,%2035mm,%20Canon%205D%29/ http://www.ales.litomisky.com/data/projects/Analog%20versus%...
- ars 15y agoNo it doesn't. This test agrees with me. It doesn't give actual resolution numbers since they didn't test correctly, but otherwise it agrees with me.
- sjwright 15y agoApologies, I should have mentioned that I was responding specifically to your claim that "35mm film resolution is around 36MP". I agreed entirely with the remainder of your post. If the best 35mm film scanned with the best drum scanner can be trounced by a five-year-old 12 megapixel camera, well, it doesn't really matter IF the 36MP claim is accurate. Outside of the lab, only achievable results matter. The fact that a 5D can even approach the quality of 50 ASA medium format film should give people pause.