3 ms·
Once again, you have avoided the question (although you've spiced it up this time with some additional condescension). You listed OpenJDK as a viable "free" op
by tw25980549 6y ago
Once again, you have avoided the question (although you've spiced it up this time with some additional condescension).
You listed OpenJDK as a viable "free" option. Defend it, or don't, but stop trying to pivot the conversation while pretending that changing the subject is a valid answer answer to the thing that was asked.
- pjmlp 6y agoThe ability to understand falls on the recipient. Your favourite search engine has the answer. If you feel like trolling, that is your problem, bye.
- tw25980549 6y agoThere is no confusion on this end. You're ignoring the question that I'm asking, because the answer is unpleasant, and you're instead responding with non-answers, because looking like you're saying something when you're really saying nothing is easier. Facts: We have evidence that Oracle doesn't care about the actual terms of GPL. We have evidence that they're willing to subject people to legal turmoil if Oracle decides they want you to pay instead of using the "free" license.
- pjmlp 6y agohttps://medium.com/@javachampions/java-is-still-free-2-0-0-6b9aa8d6d244 https://medium.com/@javachampions/java-is-still-free-2-0-0-6...
- tw25980549 6y agoAnother non-answer that avoids the question. > Defend it, or don't, but stop trying to pivot the conversation while pretending that changing the subject is a valid answer answer to the thing that was asked.