3 ms·
It is funny, because D * T suggests that it can all be done with D with just a smidgin' of T, or that you can just do a lot of talking with just a smidgin' of D
by jonnycomputer 6y ago
It is funny, because D * T suggests that it can all be done with D with just a smidgin' of T, or that you can just do a lot of talking with just a smidgin' of D.
But I guess I forgot about the Trump Presidency. So maybe D * T is the right model.
- hazeii 6y agoD == T maximises the area, and note it's not linear. If you've got 12 units to split between D and T, total return is:- 1D 11 2D 20 3D 27 4D 32 5D 35 6D 36 So inefficient to be at the smidgen end on either axis, but anywhere roughly equal is fine.
- jonnycomputer 6y agoGood pont. Still that's more or less assuming that the costs and returns of D and T are roughly similar. But talk is cheap, and it is not clear that the returns earned are the same. if we are intent on maximizing u(d, t) = u(d) * u(t) we still need u(d) and u(t) to know what quantities of d and t will do the job (assuming that there is a maximum, or not more than one...)