4 ms·

Thanks. I was wondering which license actually satisfies "Don't care" philosophy and gets me out of any legal responsibility/liability.

• torstenvl 6y ago
  Just commit the work to the public domain then.
  • jraph 6y ago
    Not legally possible in many jurisdictions.
  • davidcuddeback 6y ago
    Wouldn't you still need language to disclaim warranties and liabilities?
• pmoriarty 6y ago
  There's also this: DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, December 2004 Copyright (C) 2004 Your Name <name@example.com> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long as the name is changed. DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.
  • davidcuddeback 6y ago
    That license doesn't seem to satisfy the parent's requirements: > gets me out of any legal responsibility/liability The license you posted doesn't disclaim any warranties or liabilities. I suggest reading what TFA's "Warranty Disclaimer" section says about UCC defaults. The way I read it (IANAL), you would have more liability with the license you posted than you would under the MIT license.
    • eeZah7Ux 6y ago
      It's even worse than that. The longer the text, the stronger it is in court. That's why contracts like proprietary licenses, buying a house, renting are so verbose. "do wtf you want" is very unclear from a legal PoV.