3 ms·
I think that aspects such as this are going to be the main results of GDPR-like legislation in various places. In many cases, privacy is lost simply as a side
by PeterisP 6y ago
I think that aspects such as this are going to be the main results of GDPR-like legislation in various places.
In many cases, privacy is lost simply as a side effect of some specific desire which can be fulfilled respectfully, but the invasive methods are simpler or cheaper, so in the absence of any regulation that gets chosen - but we can easily do better if we (as the society) choose to.
- musingsole 6y agoAs computer vision capabilities increase, it's not just simpler and cheaper to use more privacy invasive means. It's often better with greater potential for improvement over time. With automated cars, lidar is amazing in a narrow band of uses while a camera is decent and getting better in a much wider band.
- Krasnol 6y agoGDPR doesn't mean that you can't use cameras at all. I only regulates what you can do with it and as long as your automatic car isn't using and selling face recognition data to Facebook, you'll be ok...