3 ms·
At risk of piling on, it is silly to cargo-cult dating articles. This is a case where the date truly is not relevant, and that should be recognized. That's a mi
by aklemm 6y ago
At risk of piling on, it is silly to cargo-cult dating articles. This is a case where the date truly is not relevant, and that should be recognized. That's a minor point compared to the larger phenomenon which is the insistence on recency for our attention. Why? Probably because the long tail isn't profitable enough, but it is a shame every portal onto the 'net except archive.org and wikipedia.org insist on recency for relevance.
- detaro 6y agoProviding a date for context is not "insisting on recency for relevance", it's providing context. Even if that context is just that some people recognize "ok, that's the article I read a while back and not an updated version".