Bingo. You just have to find the correct pair. Doesn't actually matter how old or young they are, just that they don't actually need more experience than you

Bingo. You just have to find the correct pair. Doesn't actually matter how old or young they are, just that they don't actually need more experience than you could get from two top-performing 22-year-olds that could easily make more than a million in progress over a year. And it would have even been worth it to spend the first year doing nothing but intensively searching for these two so you could have operators so far above average and so well suited to the task, and so well agreed upon over a period of a whole year, that nothing else could even come close. It would probably be best with a pair who are equally motivated whether they would be getting the half million apiece or not, because a lot of that could be spent by now. When everyone creating the software has the rare extreme performance ability that very few companies ever get to have even one employee that good, the more suitable the performance the fewer operators it should be expected to require. This just has to be put into perspective compared to what you can get from a typical bureaucratic team for $44 million. Average bureaucrats have never been good enough for average things.