4 ms·

OP mentioned RSS as terrorists because their members did violent acts. Now i know a religion whose members are usually involved in terrorists acts. We don't lab

OP mentioned RSS as terrorists because their members did violent acts. Now i know a religion whose members are usually involved in terrorists acts. We don't label them as terrorists as it should be. So tell me. Are you consistent with you beliefs on labeling groups?

srean 6y ago
> We don't label them as terrorists That's pretty much all the government cosy media does -- handing out certificates about who is patriotic and who is not. If members does an act in the name of an org and that is against the values of the organization. Its for the organization to clarify that their values do not match with the cations taken by these group. This is what the farmer protester groups did when violence occurred. This what they did when cell towers were vandalized. The RSS on the other hand has stayed mum which in normal course of action will be and is taken as tacit support. Of course I don't read all of RSS's press releases. If you have pointers to RSS official press releases where they have condemned specific attacks I would be very interested to read.
- hesarenu 6y ago
  OP labeled RSS as terrorists for its members atrocities. Seems you are agreeing with him. So tell me. Are you consistent with your labeling? Are you labeling a religion as terrorist because of some of its people?
  - srean 6y ago
    > Are you labeling a religion as terrorist because of some of its people You are just trying to avoid answering the question by adding extraneous and irrelevant diversions. Sorry wont bite your bait. BTW I was not aware that RSS is a religion. This much I am willing to claim -- RSS is a silent approver of right wing acts of violence starting all the way from Gandhi's assassination to more contemporaneous cow slaughter related lynchings. Unlike the farmer protests that have distanced itself from acts of violence and vandalism I am unaware that RSS has done that for the violence that has engulfed India in this govt, but am willing to be convinced otherwise. The spokesmen of the government have frequently branded the entire protest and Khalistani and Pakistani. I am very tickled that you seem to be outraged not by the act of the government which has real implications but on the comment someone made on the internet. That might be quite indicative of where your sympathies lie.
    - hesarenu 6y ago
      I did not event bait you. I was replying to OP and you inserted yourself. You got yourself tangled because you could not honestly answer the question. Since you became aware you are not consistent. See OP mentioned RSS as Religious terrorists because of its members. So to the logical conclusion Hindus are terrorists because of its has organizations like RSS/Guj riots involved in it. So you just called a million Hindus terrorists. Anyway whatever makes you happy.
      - srean 6y ago
        > So you just called a million Hindus terrorists. Yeah keep spreading lies if it helps. It really shows you and those that you support in revealing light. This is very good because these chats and their logic is public and for all to see and make their own judgements. Thanks for making my job easier. Pray enlighten me where I have been inconsistent without shoving your words on my mouth, and where I have called a million Hindus a terrorist. You remind me of Sambit Patra the BJP spokesperson who was asked about the number of zeros that are in trillion when he was going on and on about Indias trillion rupees economy. All this Patra could respond with is invective that the person who asked the question should go and ask Rahul Gandhi -- a cheap rhetorical device used to clutch at straws when one does not have substance to offer. I rest my case
        hesarenu 6y ago
        This is very good because these chats and their logic is public and for all to see and make their own judgements. Thanks for making my job easier. - that goes either way. All can see that you are trying to diverge the conversation instead of answering. You refusal to answer the question indicates that you agree with it. Else its a simple answer. Let me ask myself that question. Do you consider a group of people a terrorists simply because some members indulge in it. NO I DO NOT. That's it man. No grand conspiracy. No name calling nothing. Why not a simple answer. All are inherently biased. But that should not deter us in calling out inconsistently.
        6y ago

srean 6y ago

> We don't label them as terrorists That's pretty much all the government cosy media does -- handing out certificates about who is patriotic and who is not. If members does an act in the name of an org and that is against the values of the organization. Its for the organization to clarify that their values do not match with the cations taken by these group. This is what the farmer protester groups did when violence occurred. This what they did when cell towers were vandalized. The RSS on the other hand has stayed mum which in normal course of action will be and is taken as tacit support. Of course I don't read all of RSS's press releases. If you have pointers to RSS official press releases where they have condemned specific attacks I would be very interested to read.

hesarenu 6y ago
OP labeled RSS as terrorists for its members atrocities. Seems you are agreeing with him. So tell me. Are you consistent with your labeling? Are you labeling a religion as terrorist because of some of its people?
- srean 6y ago
  > Are you labeling a religion as terrorist because of some of its people You are just trying to avoid answering the question by adding extraneous and irrelevant diversions. Sorry wont bite your bait. BTW I was not aware that RSS is a religion. This much I am willing to claim -- RSS is a silent approver of right wing acts of violence starting all the way from Gandhi's assassination to more contemporaneous cow slaughter related lynchings. Unlike the farmer protests that have distanced itself from acts of violence and vandalism I am unaware that RSS has done that for the violence that has engulfed India in this govt, but am willing to be convinced otherwise. The spokesmen of the government have frequently branded the entire protest and Khalistani and Pakistani. I am very tickled that you seem to be outraged not by the act of the government which has real implications but on the comment someone made on the internet. That might be quite indicative of where your sympathies lie.
  - hesarenu 6y ago
    I did not event bait you. I was replying to OP and you inserted yourself. You got yourself tangled because you could not honestly answer the question. Since you became aware you are not consistent. See OP mentioned RSS as Religious terrorists because of its members. So to the logical conclusion Hindus are terrorists because of its has organizations like RSS/Guj riots involved in it. So you just called a million Hindus terrorists. Anyway whatever makes you happy.
    - srean 6y ago
      > So you just called a million Hindus terrorists. Yeah keep spreading lies if it helps. It really shows you and those that you support in revealing light. This is very good because these chats and their logic is public and for all to see and make their own judgements. Thanks for making my job easier. Pray enlighten me where I have been inconsistent without shoving your words on my mouth, and where I have called a million Hindus a terrorist. You remind me of Sambit Patra the BJP spokesperson who was asked about the number of zeros that are in trillion when he was going on and on about Indias trillion rupees economy. All this Patra could respond with is invective that the person who asked the question should go and ask Rahul Gandhi -- a cheap rhetorical device used to clutch at straws when one does not have substance to offer. I rest my case
      - hesarenu 6y ago
        This is very good because these chats and their logic is public and for all to see and make their own judgements. Thanks for making my job easier. - that goes either way. All can see that you are trying to diverge the conversation instead of answering. You refusal to answer the question indicates that you agree with it. Else its a simple answer. Let me ask myself that question. Do you consider a group of people a terrorists simply because some members indulge in it. NO I DO NOT. That's it man. No grand conspiracy. No name calling nothing. Why not a simple answer. All are inherently biased. But that should not deter us in calling out inconsistently.
        6y ago