4 ms·
That's the opposite of the halo effect. They're bad guys, so everything about them is bad. You can say that results are unreliable because they're not open abo
by radu_floricica 6y ago
That's the opposite of the halo effect. They're bad guys, so everything about them is bad.
You can say that results are unreliable because they're not open about the details, or didn't provide enough data, or the data they provided doesn't make sense. Vaccinations being consensual or not is unrelated to the topic.