4 ms·
I am not an archaeologist, but I thougt I understood the gist, just from the title. And after reading the article, there was little light shed. A couple of poi
by lovemenot 6y ago
I am not an archaeologist, but I thougt I understood the gist, just from the title. And after reading the article, there was little light shed.
A couple of points of context.
- urban archaelogists in Britain find a very bright line between pre-tobacco and tobacco. Once in that latter period C1650, they are immediately inundated with disposable clay pipes. Lasting a couple of centuries. But the physical nature of those pipes provides little extra information. Nobody documented their manufacture.
- Its a kind of inside joke that our contemporary civilisation will deliver a similar quandry to future archaelogists: presumably, the archaelogists of the title. That is: there will be a similar bright line between pre-1980s ring-pull which were distributed absolutely everywhere, then immediately not at all in our contemporaneously developed world.
So I assume this was written for future archaelogists to get better context on contemporary detritus.
- nine_k 6y agoI suspect that all of the aluminum, and most if regular steel, when put into soil of moderate or subtropical latitudes, will either dissolve completely or deform beyond recognition in a couple thousand years. So beer cans will have very limited availability to future archeologists. Am I wrong?