3 ms·
> extremely abusive content This phrasing suggests it was probably not even illegal to publish. What if this content had been something that Google finds poli
by einpoklum 6y ago
> extremely abusive content
This phrasing suggests it was probably not even illegal to publish.
What if this content had been something that Google finds politically or commercially disfavorable to its interests, rather than something we would all think is intolerable? What if it _is_ like that?
- hedora 6y agoTo the extent Google can lock you up for life for being inconvenient for their business model, I suppose it could have been innocuous content. Oh, wait. We’re still a decade away from that particular dystopia, so I’ll guess kiddie porn or actual planning of terrorist attacks.
- einpoklum 6y ago> so I’ll guess kiddie porn or actual planning of terrorist attacks. It seems you guess wrong. The Element guy did not mention any illegality, which is what makes me suspicious.
- GoblinSlayer 6y agoWait, if CP and terrorist attacks are posted in the open, then what FBI wants to read in e2ee traffic?