3 ms·
Yeah the field identification guide cited [1] is better, although disappointingly monochrome [1] https://www.jstor.org/stable/25616219 https://www.jstor.org/st
by pacaro 6y ago
Yeah the field identification guide cited [1] is better, although disappointingly monochrome
[1] https://www.jstor.org/stable/25616219 https://www.jstor.org/stable/25616219
- pacaro 6y agoJust reading a little more, the aforementioned guide was published in 1993, so that explains the black and white photographs somewhat.