2 ms·

No doubt, but they also cause fewer deaths from reducing healthcare overload.

incrudible 6y ago
My question would then be, what is the natural life expectancy of a suicide or opiate overdose victim, versus that of a person that would have survived COVID only with medical intervention. We should be looking at deferral of death, not just death count. Death is certain to everyone and I am reluctant to value everyone’s remaining life expectancy equally, at least as far as the healthcare system is concerned.
- midasuni 6y ago
  In the U.K. there’s no evidence of any change in suicide rates in 2020 (it’s normally about 6,000 a year). Registration delays means that we don’t know the numbers for 2020, but early indications are not much change (suicide has been increasing though and is at a record high) A much bigger issue is the lost of QALYs from lockdown but not from deaths, including the socio-economic impacts. ONS have a more through report than a Sunday morning post from a phone. https://www.ons.gov.uk/news/statementsandletters/estimatingtheimpactsofcoronavirusonenglandsmortalityandmorbidity https://www.ons.gov.uk/news/statementsandletters/estimatingt... The people who mainly benefitted from lockdown measures are the over 60s The people who mainly lost out were the under 35s The recovery plan needs to address this - including fixing the massive wealth disparity. A generation of property owning shareholders who have retired have seen their wealth and income balloon over the last year (and decade). But it won’t, millennials will be screwed.
- Shaanie 6y ago
  Life years gained is the measure you're talking about, and that's definitely a good measure to take into consideration.
Ekaros 6y ago
Now on the other side do lock-downs cause less use of healthcare? And will it result in health-debt? If there is less preventive maintenance done on population will that results increased deaths in future? Thinking of elective surgeries and so on...

My question would then be, what is the natural life expectancy of a suicide or opiate overdose victim, versus that of a person that would have survived COVID only with medical intervention. We should be looking at deferral of death, not just death count. Death is certain to everyone and I am reluctant to value everyone’s remaining life expectancy equally, at least as far as the healthcare system is concerned.

midasuni 6y ago
In the U.K. there’s no evidence of any change in suicide rates in 2020 (it’s normally about 6,000 a year). Registration delays means that we don’t know the numbers for 2020, but early indications are not much change (suicide has been increasing though and is at a record high) A much bigger issue is the lost of QALYs from lockdown but not from deaths, including the socio-economic impacts. ONS have a more through report than a Sunday morning post from a phone. https://www.ons.gov.uk/news/statementsandletters/estimatingtheimpactsofcoronavirusonenglandsmortalityandmorbidity https://www.ons.gov.uk/news/statementsandletters/estimatingt... The people who mainly benefitted from lockdown measures are the over 60s The people who mainly lost out were the under 35s The recovery plan needs to address this - including fixing the massive wealth disparity. A generation of property owning shareholders who have retired have seen their wealth and income balloon over the last year (and decade). But it won’t, millennials will be screwed.
Shaanie 6y ago
Life years gained is the measure you're talking about, and that's definitely a good measure to take into consideration.

Ekaros 6y ago

Now on the other side do lock-downs cause less use of healthcare? And will it result in health-debt? If there is less preventive maintenance done on population will that results increased deaths in future? Thinking of elective surgeries and so on...