I am not a native speaker; it can thus be assumed to be a combination of many different dialects. My pronunciation, however: - features the trap–bath split -

I am not a native speaker; it can thus be assumed to be a combination of many different dialects. My pronunciation, however: - features the trap–bath split - is non-rhotic, has a fairly consistent linking-r, but no intrusive-r. - ordinarily features the whine–wine merger, but does split them again in stressed interrogatives - does not undergo flapping of alveolar stops - ocasionally realizes fortis alveolar stops as glottal stops intervocallically, but never in a stressed context - realizes fortis alveolar alveolar stops as affricativess before /u/ and /i/ in a stressed context, rather than as aspirates - features l-vocalization in the coda of syllables - features neither yod-dropping nor yod-coalescence such that “soot” “shoot” and “suit” are a minimal triplet - fronts /ai/ to a realization of [ɑe̯] I know of no actual English dialect that combines these features, as expected of a non-native speaker, with the exception of it's non-rhotic nature, it seems to gravitate towards a realization that mostly combines the different kdistinctions made in most dialects, assimilating splits, but not mergers.