4 ms·
> I am all for peaceful protests, the constitution has given every citizen the right to protest They have been peaceful protesting for literally months now. On
by middleclick 6y ago
> I am all for peaceful protests, the constitution has given every citizen the right to protest
They have been peaceful protesting for literally months now. One bad incident does not mean anything and there is a lot of information about how the government goons infiltrated the protests.
If you are all for peaceful protests, you wouldn't single out one single incident but that's exactly what you are doing and I think it's malicious. Which you are free to do, but please don't pretend otherwise.
- 0xFFFE 6y ago> One bad incident does not mean anything Is it really? There are literally 100s of youtube videos of protesters damaging public property and attacking Police. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqiwIbUzPyo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqiwIbUzPyo Here is a the Guardian link. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/26/violent-clashes-as-indian-farmers-storm-delhis-red-fort https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/26/violent-clashe... Times now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1kC7RPEniM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1kC7RPEniM > there is a lot of information about how the government goons infiltrated the protests. Can you cite a source? EDIT: Formatting
- middleclick 6y agoDid you read your own links? > Samyukta Kisan Morcha, an umbrella organisation representing more than 40 farmers’ unions, condemned those who had taken part in the clashes and said that “anti-social elements had infiltrated the otherwise peaceful movement”. The organizers clearly condemned the violence. What else should they do? Repeating what you conveniently ignored: one bad incident does not override months of completely peaceful protests, acknowledged by residents of the areas where they were protesting. And yet, you bring up just that one thing, which is very much in line with the government propaganda. The Republic link was the icing on the cake. Like I said, you are free to believe what you want but painting yourself as pro freedom of protests while ignoring the fact that they have been peaceful for months and singling out this one thing says a lot about your bias. Source: https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/farmers-storm-india-s-red-fort-by-the-thousands-1.5282103 https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/farmers-storm-india-s-red-fort-... > The farmers have been staging largely peaceful protests for nearly two months
- 0xFFFE 6y ago> Repeating what you conveniently ignored: one bad incident does not override months of completely peaceful protests I am not the one conveniently forgetting violence at the Red fort. Let me ask you, why even protest when the Supreme court is hearing the case and Govt has agreed to put the law on hold for 1.5 years. Why violence & blocking highways? Why not take it up with Supreme Court?
- middleclick 6y agoThe Supreme Court of India is going to listen to the farmers? The same Supreme Court that asked why and I quote, "why old people and women are kept in the protests" as if thousands of old farmers were paid money and brought in to the protests? I repeat: protesting is a fundamental right. Farmers have been protesting peacefully for months. One bad incident is not reflective of the otherwise largely peaceful protests. You are ignoring this line. https://www.newslaundry.com/2021/01/14/sorry-this-isnt-a-mans-protest-women-farmers-on-sc-wanting-them-to-go-home https://www.newslaundry.com/2021/01/14/sorry-this-isnt-a-man... You can drop the facade at this stage and stop wasting everyone's time. At least have the audacity to be genuine of your beliefs. To not be so is cowardly.
- sbmthakur 6y agoWhy shouldn't the SC ask that question? They are not issuing a diktat. It's a large group and a certain degree of coercion, even if small, is likely involved. It's only now that it's coming out in open. https://www.freepressjournal.in/viral/protest-or-pay-a-fine-this-punjab-village-is-rallying-support-for-farmers-agitation-in-an-unusual-way https://www.freepressjournal.in/viral/protest-or-pay-a-fine-... We are talking about areas around Delhi where women and children have much less liberty when compared to other regions of India.
- middleclick 6y agoWhy should they? If they had done basic research, they wouldn't even have come up something as asinine as this. Fact: women contribute to farm work as much as men in Punjab: https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/in-punjab-women-take-charge-of-farms-as-menfolk-take-part-in-protests-at-delhi-border/story-nPFLTQPiBNpEYgeNQFNiPJ.html https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/in-punjab-women-take-c.... So women are a part of the protest because they are also affected by this. Why even bring this up at all? > We are talking about areas around Delhi where women and children have much less liberty when compared to other regions of India. The fact that you wrote this shows how little you know about this. The majority of the farmers protesting are Punjabi farmers. Do you know that in a Punjabi household, women participate in the work equally? This is not like UP or Bihar. Even in religious ceremonies, women participate equally. Don't bring up your own discriminatory customs and think they apply to every other community in India. Coming back to the Supreme Court, this is the same court that has got its tiny feelings upset over a political satire: https://scroll.in/latest/985456/contempt-case-against-rachita-taneja-criticism-of-courts-growing-everybody-is-doing-it-says-sc https://scroll.in/latest/985456/contempt-case-against-rachit... Should I point out the relation between the ex Chief Justice and the ruling party? You are pretty terrible at this.
- throwawaysea 6y agoDo you have strong, proven evidence for infiltration? Otherwise this seems like the typical false flag conspiracy we always hear when protests turn violent. The reality is even those acting peacefully are providing cover for those acting violently among their ranks. They also often incite that violent fringe to action, and condone or overlook their actions. Silence is violence, right? And remaining silent on those using violence to achieve political goals - the very definition of terrorism - isn’t acceptable.
- middleclick 6y agoSuch things are typically reported by the media. One of the problems in India though is that the media is completely biased towards the government. The prime minister of the world's largest democracy has held exactly zero press conferences in 6-7 years. When he does, they are incredibly scripted where they ask him if he likes to eat mangoes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dUyQWcn1CA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dUyQWcn1CA). He also does a poor job of answering tough questions (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAGAYL8dtic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAGAYL8dtic) so the media interviews he does give are more of a PR stunt for him where the "journalists" praise his qualities and ask him no hard questions. Coming back to your question: the farmers have clearly said they denounce the violence in more than one ways. The other thing that is leading more credence to this theory is how the police treated the people indulging in violence. Evidence from the ground shows that the police shook hands and were generally very respectful towards them. This suggests infiltration. More sources: https://thewire.in/agriculture/day-of-clashes-with-bjp-sponsored-goons-bolsters-farmers-resolve https://thewire.in/agriculture/day-of-clashes-with-bjp-spons...