3 ms·
1) Yes, I specifically pointed out that these numbers are being circulated everywhere. They are baseless and intentionally misleading. It might even amount to a
by mike00632 6y ago
1) Yes, I specifically pointed out that these numbers are being circulated everywhere. They are baseless and intentionally misleading. It might even amount to a crime. It matters that you can't vouch for these numbers despite repeating them yourself.
2) You intentionally used language that casts doubt on the only well-sourced statement, that Melvin got rid of their short position. If you're going to be so skeptical then I want to know why. If you think that CNBC is colluding with hedgefunds and intentionally publishing misinformation then I want to know why you are suggesting that.
- PartiallyTyped 6y agoHow about this? https://financhill.com/most-heavily-shorted-stocks-today https://financhill.com/most-heavily-shorted-stocks-today 250% of floating shares.
- mike00632 6y agoWow! That cite has a lot of numbers! They even explain what a short is! It's like one-stop shopping for misinfo on how to devastate your finances.
- PartiallyTyped 6y agoMore sources follow along then to shortsight and ortex for more numbers. https://isthesqueezesquoze.com/ https://isthesqueezesquoze.com/
- PartiallyTyped 6y agoMore numbers https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/are-these-the-best-heavily-shorted-stocks-to-buy-right-now-5-names-to-watch-2021-01-31 https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/are-these-the-best-heavily-s... 121% short.