Giving people sufficient basic resources for survival doesn't stop them from working. Everyone being paid more than a living wage is already choosing to do mor

Giving people sufficient basic resources for survival doesn't stop them from working. Everyone being paid more than a living wage is already choosing to do more work than they have to. Why do you assume that people would stop working, if they have a choice? It's already evident that people choose to work without coercion, if they are paid properly. My point is that coercion via threat of personal destitution is bad and should be eliminated, not that work is bad.