> There is nothing special about being short more than 100% The actual value was 113% from S3, but other sources had different values so I rounded down. While

> There is nothing special about being short more than 100% The actual value was 113% from S3, but other sources had different values so I rounded down. While there is nothing magic about 113% or 100% or any other number, it is a measure of the difficulty of covering the entirety of the short interest: Higher numbers are more likely to result in a short squeeze, since those covering will likely have a higher bid to attract the attention of longs.