A closer analogy is Walmart deciding what goes on its shelves and it being hard for users to buy from any other store besides Walmart once they choose a “Walmar

A closer analogy is Walmart deciding what goes on its shelves and it being hard for users to buy from any other store besides Walmart once they choose a “Walmart” device which locks them into their choice a bit. I can see the argument, I just don’t think the power is being wielded for consumer harm - if it was that’d be different. If Apple was blocking some company from their store everyone wanted because they were competing with an Apple product that’d be an issue. As it is they’re making it easy for their users to not be spied on. In the analogy it’d be Walmart checking that what they stock on shelves doesn’t poison their customers. Are they wielding power? Sure - is that monopoly abuse? No.