5 ms·
They are paying for ads saying they closed their position. Why would they do that if they actually closed? The occams razor pushing naivety of this forum is rea
by rorykoehler 6y ago
They are paying for ads saying they closed their position. Why would they do that if they actually closed? The occams razor pushing naivety of this forum is really starting to grate. How many times do they have to fool you before you get the message?
- 8note 6y agoAltruism would be one reason? Individuals buying now are more likely to get screwed. On a self-interested side, they could be wanting as few retail investors to lose as possible to minimize the calls for new regulations
- lovich 6y agoWhen has altruism ever been a factor in the decisions made by financial firms? That's as on the face farcical as saying that a lion didn't eat a deer because it felt like being a good guy that day.
- newacct583 6y agoSeen this twice now. This is another conspiracy theory. The screenshot going around is NOT a paid ad from Melvin, it's a promotion of a headline from a CNBC show. CNBC doesn't take money to issue ads on behalf of its guests, they were merely teasing the content of the segment.