4 ms·

> And I mean if you want, ask RH and they'll downgrade to to a cash account... just be ready for T+2 and no options trading You can do options trading on a cas

> And I mean if you want, ask RH and they'll downgrade to to a cash account... just be ready for T+2 and no options trading You can do options trading on a cash account. You can only do covered options, but honestly that's probably a good restriction for most.

hmaxwell 6y ago
I think the way it works now is great, being able to go short on naked options with a proper margin maintenance is way smarter than restricting everyone to go long on options or only allow people to sell calls on covered options (which kind of defeats the purpose of a bearish position when you are required to hold the deliverables).
- kllrnohj 6y ago
  For a mass-market low-education target demographic? The defaults matter here. Retail investors shouldn't be restricted from having such capabilities, but that doesn't mean it should be the default
  - didibus 6y ago
    Maybe I'm missing something, but what's the problem with this being the default?
- manigandham 6y ago
  A bearish position is to be long on puts. You don't need to write options, especially naked options which are usually the highest tier of access on every broker and require extra agreements.
  - hmaxwell 6y ago
    If you only go long on options, theta is eventually going to catch up with you.
BoorishBears 6y ago
Edit: Actually can you show me where RH even says you can trade covered options without Instant? I've only found evidence to the contrary, I think you're lying. https://robinhood.com/us/en/support/articles/options-investing/ https://robinhood.com/us/en/support/articles/options-investi... > NOTE: If you start options trading in your Cash account, we’ll automatically upgrade you to an Instant account. Maybe if you've downgraded they won't upgrade you, but it's neither here nor there, covered options aren't what have allowed this to happen If Robinhood only had covered options you'd be right back where I said it'd be: not supporting the way people are using it to enable all this.
- kllrnohj 6y ago
  I'm not talking about Robinhood specifically but general rules & regulations (see eg https://www.fool.com/the-ascent/buying-stocks/margin-account-vs-cash-account/ https://www.fool.com/the-ascent/buying-stocks/margin-account... ). RH specifically may have their own constraints beyond what's necessary, though. In which case get yourself a better brokerage.
  - BoorishBears 6y ago
    Multiple brokerages have similar restrictions. And the discussion is about Robinhood. Any reasonable person reading your comment would rightfully assume you're talking about Robinhood.
- nrmitchi 6y ago
  > NOTE: If you start options trading in your Cash account, we’ll automatically upgrade you to an Instant account. HAHA oh my god this is terrifyingly predatory. It says "automatically", but I hope that there is a notice at least. Even if someone went to the effort to make sure that they understood their account type, it would just... change out from under them. This is sort of like accidently using a premium feature in some SaaS platform, and being automatically upgraded into a free trial without knowing.
  - BoorishBears 6y ago

hmaxwell 6y ago

I think the way it works now is great, being able to go short on naked options with a proper margin maintenance is way smarter than restricting everyone to go long on options or only allow people to sell calls on covered options (which kind of defeats the purpose of a bearish position when you are required to hold the deliverables).

kllrnohj 6y ago
For a mass-market low-education target demographic? The defaults matter here. Retail investors shouldn't be restricted from having such capabilities, but that doesn't mean it should be the default
- didibus 6y ago
  Maybe I'm missing something, but what's the problem with this being the default?
manigandham 6y ago
A bearish position is to be long on puts. You don't need to write options, especially naked options which are usually the highest tier of access on every broker and require extra agreements.
- hmaxwell 6y ago
  If you only go long on options, theta is eventually going to catch up with you.

BoorishBears 6y ago

Edit: Actually can you show me where RH even says you can trade covered options without Instant? I've only found evidence to the contrary, I think you're lying. https://robinhood.com/us/en/support/articles/options-investing/ https://robinhood.com/us/en/support/articles/options-investi... > NOTE: If you start options trading in your Cash account, we’ll automatically upgrade you to an Instant account. Maybe if you've downgraded they won't upgrade you, but it's neither here nor there, covered options aren't what have allowed this to happen If Robinhood only had covered options you'd be right back where I said it'd be: not supporting the way people are using it to enable all this.

kllrnohj 6y ago
I'm not talking about Robinhood specifically but general rules & regulations (see eg https://www.fool.com/the-ascent/buying-stocks/margin-account-vs-cash-account/ https://www.fool.com/the-ascent/buying-stocks/margin-account... ). RH specifically may have their own constraints beyond what's necessary, though. In which case get yourself a better brokerage.
- BoorishBears 6y ago
  Multiple brokerages have similar restrictions. And the discussion is about Robinhood. Any reasonable person reading your comment would rightfully assume you're talking about Robinhood.
nrmitchi 6y ago
> NOTE: If you start options trading in your Cash account, we’ll automatically upgrade you to an Instant account. HAHA oh my god this is terrifyingly predatory. It says "automatically", but I hope that there is a notice at least. Even if someone went to the effort to make sure that they understood their account type, it would just... change out from under them. This is sort of like accidently using a premium feature in some SaaS platform, and being automatically upgraded into a free trial without knowing.
- BoorishBears 6y ago