"This post is the third installment of our five-part series on building GitHub’s new homepage" Imagine the ridiculous amount of money that has to have been spe

"This post is the third installment of our five-part series on building GitHub’s new homepage" Imagine the ridiculous amount of money that has to have been spent on the spinning globe thing. Enough not to have a random blog post talking about, it but a five-part SERIES!!! The frontpage eats up almost 90% CPU on firefox on my computer[0] and not as much, but still high in chrome. Maybe that has something to do with graphics acceleration, or my computer isn't good enough, or some other thing where it's my fault.. But it's ironic the situation exists for a site with a five-part series describing how "performant" it is. Scrolling down the site loads up 4.5 MB of bandwidth transferred, 6.5 MB resources loaded, and 110 requests. Could be worse, but the fact this almost seems 'normal' now is a sad state of affairs. As an aside, I understand this is GitHub's primary marketing vehicle to really Impress and Wow newcomers to the site -- hoping to blow them away with neon graphics and slick animation. But honestly, is this kind of dribbble.com-esque readymade really impressing anyone these days?! Have years of A/B testing determined that a neon space adventure yields the highest level of new user signups??[1] [0]: https://i.imgur.com/vSFxUO9.gif https://i.imgur.com/vSFxUO9.gif [1]: https://i.imgur.com/5IWdM3e.png https://i.imgur.com/5IWdM3e.png