4 ms·
Book publishers just have an archaic business model. I happily pay for Safari Books Online which gives me access to all O'Reilly published books and I imagine I
by BoysenberryPi 6y ago
Book publishers just have an archaic business model. I happily pay for Safari Books Online which gives me access to all O'Reilly published books and I imagine I'd be willing to do the same if other services offered something similar for non-technical books. Instead of looking towards how the video industry handled piracy, book publishers just seem stuck in their ways.
- xhkkffbf 6y agoHave you heard of Kindle Unlimited? Amazon's been running this for years. They even pay the authors based upon how many pages are read. It's a very granular model. Audible runs a similar service for audio books.
- Mediterraneo10 6y agoIt is worth noting that publishers have been trying to adjust to the new economic realities, but this means they have to slash quality typesetting and even basic editing and proofreading. The result is that many books today are frustratingly sloppy compared to a few years ago, even from publishing houses that were once august and revered.
- grawprog 6y ago>but this means they have to slash quality typesetting and even basic editing and proofreading At that point, what's the point of using a publisher vs. self publishing or using some kind of print on demand service?
- Mediterraneo10 6y agoPublishers still often do some kind of promotion, e.g. ensuring that review copies get to influencers, hawking the book at book fairs, etc. Self-publishing means you have to do all the promotional work yourself. Also, certain books in the humanities can have their costs covered by grants, and the publisher might already have staff that are proficient in grant-writing, while authors don't have that savvy or reputation.
- flower-giraffe 6y ago>> Publishers still often do some kind of promotion. Which is almost certainly how the article about a book due to be published in April came to be written.