3 ms·
>> Apple could take measures against FB. How about deplatforming them? That will only make the case against Apple - walled garden and all that >> How about NO
by abc_lisper 6y ago
>> Apple could take measures against FB. How about deplatforming them?
That will only make the case against Apple - walled garden and all that
>> How about NOT allowing them to include trackers in Safari or apps, bankrupting their revenue stream?
You know they are anonymized right? Also, you are not even talking about pennies on the dollar, when it comes to Apple's revenue. I suggest you read the recently quarterly financial report.
>> Genocide for dollars, the way it's always worked. Apple is being disingenuous here.
There's a case to be made for world to be appearing as we see it. You don't kick the good boy in a rowdy party(that is web) for not being good enough.
- ndiscussion 6y agowalled garden: Apple is already known as a walled garden, and that has nothing to do with this virtue signaling around "stopping violence" revenue stream: I'm referring to FB's revenue stream here. Apple could have a policy like: Your apps cannot contain advertisements targeted by sex, race, or religion genocide: You think FB is the good boy in this party? Or am I misunderstanding? Because to me, that seems comically naive.
- abc_lisper 6y agoI was only talking about Apple.
- ndiscussion 6y agoThen why did you reply to me? Sorry, I'm just very confused... you asked how this was related to the issue at hand. It's related because this is an empty statement put out for PR purposes, and I believe is purposefully misleading to paint Apple in a good light.