You have stated no less than three completely incorrect and unprovable statements that are contradicted directly by the facts. 1. The Antirim report was conduc

You have stated no less than three completely incorrect and unprovable statements that are contradicted directly by the facts. 1. The Antirim report was conducted by Russell James Ramsland who is the exact same non-expert person who mixed up Minnesota and Michigan. So, yes it does have something to do with it. 2. The report was not ordered by a judge, it was permitted. The distinction matters, because suggesting the judge 'ordered it' implies that it was some sort of impartial inquiry, instead of just another hack job by someone who wanted Trump to win. 3. The surveillance footage and the water pipe events happened on different nights, 17 hours apart. That's just purely on the basis of facts that even aren't up for argument. There's much more to disagree with when further analyzing your claims, and while I'd be happy to go over them, I don't feel like a deep comment on an old news story is the best place for me to spend my time. That your three main points contain full on factual misstatements should give you enough pause to reconsider the certainty of your conclusion.