3 ms·
Compare that to this beauty: http://ftp.scsh.net/pub/scsh/0.6/scsh-manual.ps.gz http://ftp.scsh.net/pub/scsh/0.6/scsh-manual.ps.gz pp. 10 onward. It's such a pi
by ephaeton 6y ago
Compare that to this beauty: http://ftp.scsh.net/pub/scsh/0.6/scsh-manual.ps.gz http://ftp.scsh.net/pub/scsh/0.6/scsh-manual.ps.gz pp. 10 onward. It's such a pity scsh is dead ...
- bjoli 6y agoThe only thing I really miss from scsh is the process notation (which is arguably the hardest to implement). The rest is pretty well covered in most schemes. Srfi-115 has sexpr regular expressions, srfi-166 is, IMO, the best formatting utility there is.
- cat199 6y agonot very 'alive', but there is a 64 bit port to current scheme48 around, so it can still be used. didn't really make it to distro packages (yet) however
- chriswarbo 6y agoI found the shell-pipeline package for Racket pretty nice a few years ago https://docs.racket-lang.org/shell-pipeline https://docs.racket-lang.org/shell-pipeline The API seems to have changed a bit since I last used it, so not sure how nice the current version is. It's also apparently used by a shell-like language called Rash, but I've not used that either https://docs.racket-lang.org/rash https://docs.racket-lang.org/rash