4 ms·
While I like what PDS projects like this are aiming to achieve the two big problems with the approach that I see are: 1) Traction. There's no reason for third
by headmelted 6y ago
While I like what PDS projects like this are aiming to achieve the two big problems with the approach that I see are:
1) Traction. There's no reason for third parties to give up what they view as lucrative personal data on you to have it stored elsewhere. The status quo is profitable for them, and this is an unproven system with no market share - so they have a handy excuse not to cater for it.
2) PDS solutions don't only aggregate your data, but congregate it - centrally - for a bad actor to later exploit should the software ever be compromised.
I think the ideal solution here is something along the lines of what Blur and Apple Private Relay are doing.
As a side note, I'd really like to see Apple expand the private relay service beyond Sign in With Apple so that I can use private relay addresses with third party services that haven't already moved to support SIWA. Given the private relay e-mail is bound to the user by Apple, they should be able to make this slick enough to allow you to sign-in to the same account later if that service moves to support SIWA down the road.
Beyond that, I'd love them to expand to anonymization services. I would be quite happy to have packages or mail from third parties arrive addressed to "FAO: RELAY-AMAZON:GX43UJXKL56ASFHU" rather than to my actual name such that I don't need to give that information out.
With Apple's (or even Google's) clout, I could ultimately see either of them (if they wanted to do so) win over a lot of goodwill by pushing the private relay to a person's full identity rather than just their e-mail. They've shown before they can make moonshot disruptions work if they're so motivated (e.g. Apple Pay). Google is already doing this for phones with Google Voice. I'd pay for that service. I'd pay a lot for that, actually.
- Vinnl 6y ago> There's no reason for third parties to give up what they view as lucrative personal data on you to have it stored elsewhere. The status quo is profitable for them, and this is an unproven system with no market share - so they have a handy excuse not to cater for it. There are a lot of third parties, and for many of them, keeping your data is not their expertise nor business model, and neither is the protection of it. There's plenty of personal data sloshing around in badly protected databases of companies that need to use it for their primary competence, and for whom new legislation is increasingly turning it into a liability. Being able to use it without needing to be responsible for it can still be an attractive proposition. (Disclosure: I work on what is presumably a competitor to this project, though opinions are my own.)
- headmelted 6y agoI look forward to the day we get there. From my own experience, companies aren't taking those responsibilities nearly seriously enough yet - although heftier punishments under new laws will hopefully change that.