4 ms·
I read it as GP arguing we don't do enough of it.
by ksml 6y ago
I read it as GP arguing we don't do enough of it.
- rat9988 6y agoMy english may be failing me here, but doesn't > I feel it sets a precedent for research broadly imply it's some sort of first time?
- vulcan01 6y agoGenerally, precedent means first "well-known" time, or first time by a respected person/institution/company. I don't know enough about this field to know if this is the first time Google has published a negative result.
- snoshy 6y agoThis is a fair point to consider. Perhaps my claim was a bit overbroad.
- snoshy 6y agoYes, this was my intent. It's not that security researchers don't publish this kind of thing... it's just that there are a million rabbit holes to explore, and probably only like 0.1% of those dead ends get written about.