Sure. Make sense. There is some precedent for determining damages, and that RH are optimizing for it. How is this not also market manipulation? Lots/most of th

Sure. Make sense. There is some precedent for determining damages, and that RH are optimizing for it. How is this not also market manipulation? Lots/most of the trades on target stocks are trading via RH. RH is restricting the access of buyers, but not sellers. How could this decision not affect/suppress prices. I will not pretend to guess at potential liabilities of one choice or the other, but the one they made does seem to corrupt the market most. I guess it's cliche to ask this about a financial scandal but... how is this legal? Can a broker really decide that people can either hold or sell, but not buy a stock?