4 ms·
Ok, I know very little about the actual stock market, just some theory. But what I heard so far was, that the fond was for high risk investment. "Some people
by hutzlibu 6y ago
Ok, I know very little about the actual stock market, just some theory.
But what I heard so far was, that the fond was for high risk investment.
"Some people are absolutely going to lose their homes / retirement savings at the end of all this."
So people who will indeed loose their homes, would have lost with high risk investment. Which would be sad for them, but high risk is called high risk for a reason.
If you want to play safe, there are low risk options.
So I don't see need for regulation because of this. For other reasons, yeah, but not that one, unless I am missing something?
- p1mrx 6y ago> "Some people are absolutely going to lose their homes / retirement savings at the end of all this." > So people who will indeed loose their homes This is a rare example of spelling de-correction.
- hutzlibu 6y agoApologies, non native speaker. And I don't get your reply.. So I misspelled lose with loose. But loose in this context can also be a play of words with lose? What are de-corrections?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- tqi 6y agoWell I think the case for regulation is that they are giving inexperienced investors the ability to make life altering (in both good and bad ways) decisions that they may not fully understand, compounded by a gamified and potentially addictive UI.